Lame debate
April 17th, 2008
By Gerardo Orlando
There’s not much more to say. The blogosphere has rightfully ripped ABC to shreds for the pathetic “gotcha” questions.
As usual, Obama has a great response.
April 17th, 2008
By Gerardo Orlando
There’s not much more to say. The blogosphere has rightfully ripped ABC to shreds for the pathetic “gotcha” questions.
As usual, Obama has a great response.
April 17th, 2008 19:24
So the media FINALLY tested to see what BO is made up of– grilled him a bit—and it’s “gotcha politics?” Please…
BO seemed to stumble a bit- having no experience being challenged and HC came off almost likable (did I REALLY just type that???). Can things get any stranger???
The Wright factor, BO’s dumb elitist comment in California, Michelle’s dumb comments, BO”s affiliations with other questionable characters (the guy from weather underground comes to mind), and his ULTRA left stance is beginning to take some of the sheen off his image, and people are waking up.
More and more I don’t think this guy stands a chance in the general election.
AND Springsteen’s endorsement may have been the kiss of death– now all he needs is Gore’s endorsement.
Things are looking up.
April 17th, 2008 21:28
Evidence:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news/ap/politics/2008/Apr/17/ap_yahoo_poll_shows_mccain_winning_back_unhappy_republicans.html
April 17th, 2008 22:40
Dream on Nick. The Real Clear Politics average has them tied despite all these “issues” coming out about Obama. If you really think the Weather Underground guy is an issue then you’re a flaming right winger
(Pun intended - ha!)
April 18th, 2008 09:35
The W underground dude is just another link in his nutty puzzle, brother– BO has problems and all y’all on the left are pissed because he finally had to take some heat. I was getting bored with politics and discourgaed in general– I’m enjoying it again!
…and is there anything wrong with bieing a flaming right winger???????????? I’ve been called worse– probably by you
April 18th, 2008 12:03
Ha!
April 23rd, 2008 10:32
Why should we ignore the fact that BHO either (a) does not understand basic tax revenue history, or (b) is a true income redistributionist who prefers high tax rates as a matter of ideological dogma regardless of the revenue consequences? I’m glad they asked him to explain this crap. What is “gotcha” about it?