The movie is just as bad as the Bush presidency. Josh Brolin gives an inspired performance, but most of the film falls flat.
The film works best when focusing on Bush’s life story and his rise to the presidency. His relationship with his father was central to his life, and his interactions with his parents and Laura inspired the more interesting parts of the film.
Regarding his presidency, however, all we see are caricatures of the people around him. Scenes are invented based upon public statements we saw in other contexts, but they seem forced and inauthentic. Historians can rightfully criticize the roles of administrations officials like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, but the portrayals of these men in the film are ridiculous.
Someday, we’ll see a serious movie that delves into the disasterous Bush presidency and the march to war, but “W” is not that movie. Oliver Stone goes for a lighter touch, but he doesn’t deliver enough laughs to make this a successfult comedy. In the end, it’s mostly a waste of time.
Posted in: Conservatives, Humor, Iraq War, Media, Republicans
Tags: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush, movie review, Oliver Stone, W movie
I will go see it anyways, as i like most of Stone’s work and I like the trailers i have seen on W.
from what i see Stone tries to put some sense to the incomprehensible truth that a fool somehow became president. The premise of Bush as the black sheep in a great american family who somehow is “saved” and starts to achieve beyond his capabilities, only to end up destroying his family name in the end, is certainly more romantic than what many of us believe, which is that we Americans are really the fools to blame for having elected a moron.