Notice: Undefined variable: galink_author_id in /home/premiumh/domains/northcoastblog.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/google-author-link/google-author-link.php on line 114

Category: President 2008 (Page 22 of 80)

Fred Thompson’s speech

Fred Thompson gave a decent speech at the Republican convention, focusing on John McCain’s biography, particularly his impressive military background.

Overall, the speech probably pleased the base, but it’s hard to imagine how this speech would convert anyone. I’m surprised he didn’t go after Barack Obama with more gusto. Four years ago, the Republicans destroyed John Kerry. Their only hope this year is to do the same to Obama, but Thompson didn’t land many punches. The line about abortion certainly got the base going, but I doubt independents will be swayed by that.

Country first?

Maybe the new slogan should be “Alaska first.”

ABC News is reporting that Sarah Palin was once a member Alaskan Independence Party. The party’s platform has long had a plank advocating a vote in Alaska on whether to secede from the United States.

Officials of the Alaskan Independence Party say that Palin was once so independent, she was once a member of their party, which since the 1970s has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States.

And while McCain’s motto — as seen in a new TV ad — is “Country First,” the AIP’s motto is the exact opposite — “Alaska First — Alaska Always.”

Lynette Clark, the chairman of the AIP, tells ABC News that Palin and her husband Todd were members in 1994, even attending the 1994 statewide convention in Wasilla. Clark was AIP secretary at the time.

“We are a state’s rights party,” Clark — a self-employed goldminer — tells ABC News. The AIP has “a plank that challenges the legality of the Alaskan statehood vote as illegal and in violation of United Nations charter and international law.”

This may amount to nothing, but it’s astonishing that the McCain campaign was not prepared for this stuff. She better have a good explanation for this.

As Josh Marshall and other bloggers have been reporting, it’s clear now that the McCain camapign did not vet Palin thoroughly before making this pick. They are now sending a team of lawyers to Alaska to do damage control and work on the vetting process that should have been completed before the pick was made.

Frankly, this raises the question of McCain’s fitness for the presidency. There are many legitimate questions regarding his temperment and his shoot-from-the-hip style. The more we learn about the process (or lack of process) behind this pick, the more it looks like a reckless decision.

UPDATE: The McCain camapign is claiming that Sarah Palin was not a member of this party, though reports suggest her husband may have been a member, and she did a video presentation at their convention this year. In any event, it took them several days to address this, and Sarah Palin herself still has net made herself available for any interviews to answer questions.

Obama’s statement regarding Palin’s daughter

News broke today that Sarah Palin’s 17-year-old daughter is pregnant. Naturally the news media is jumping on this story, as Sarah Palin is an unknown.

Barack Obama issued an appropriate statement:

I have heard some of the news on this and so let me be as clear as possible. I have said before and I will repeat again, I think people’s families are off limits, and people’s children are especially off limits. This shouldn’t be part of our politics, it has no relevance to governor Palin’s performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. And so I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18. And how family deals with issues and teenage children that shouldn’t be the topic of our politics and I hope that anybody who is supporting me understands that is off limits.

Sarah Palin misled us on “bridge to nowhere”

This one is pretty bad. The McCain campaign and GOP activists who are starved for someone to add excitement to this campaign have been touting Sarah Palin as a “reformer.” In her speech introducing herself to America, she bragged about being against the infamous “bridge to nowhere,” the ultimate example of government waste and earmark abuse.

Well, it turns out that she was actually FOR the bridge to nowhere back in 2006 when she was running for governor. The Anchorage Daily News has the details:

When John McCain introduced Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate Friday, her reputation as a tough-minded budget-cutter was front and center.

“I told Congress, thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere,” Palin told the cheering McCain crowd, referring to Ketchikan’s Gravina Island bridge.

But Palin was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it.

The Alaska governor campaigned in 2006 on a build-the-bridge platform, telling Ketchikan residents she felt their pain when politicians called them “nowhere.” They’re still feeling pain today in Ketchikan, over Palin’s subsequent decision to use the bridge funds for other projects — and over the timing of her announcement, which they say came in a pre-dawn press release that seemed aimed at national news deadlines.

“I think that’s when the campaign for national office began,” said Ketchikan Mayor Bob Weinstein on Saturday.

Meanwhile, Weinstein noted, the state is continuing to build a road on Gravina Island to an empty beach where the bridge would have gone — because federal money for the access road, unlike the bridge money, would have otherwise been returned to the federal government.

This stinks. I’m sure she’s done some good things in Alaska, but this makes her look like the poster child of cynical politics and political opportunism. Alaska is notorious for living off of money from the federal government because they have slimeballs like Senator Ted Stevens funneling money to the state. Sarah Palin was happy to get that money, and she was happy to make the bridge a campaign issue when she needed to get elected governor.

Now she’s trying to claim the opposite position while ruuning for national office, AND she’s using it as an example of her “integrity.”

It’s galling that she would do this, but it’s amazing that she thought she could make this ridiculous claim without getting called on it.

Sarah Palin’s Troopergate scandal

One reason I’m surprised by the pick of Sarah Palin relates to the ethics issues she’s been facing in Alaska. TPM and other news organizations have been reporting on this issue.

As mentioned earlier, Gov. Palin is embroiled in her own trooper-gate scandal up in Alaska. In short, she’s accused of using her pull as governor to get her ex-brother-in-law fired as a state trooper. The brother-in-law is embroiled in an ugly divorce and custody with Palin’s sister. And after his boss wouldn’t fire the brother-in-law, she fired the boss. Palin originally insisted there was nothing to the story. More recently, she was forced to admit the one of her top deputies had pushed to get the guy fired.

This might not end up as a big story, but it could be a huge distraction for the McCain campaign.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2023 NorthCoastBlog.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑