Page 96 of 170

Rick Warren’s forum

Both Barack Obama and John McCain did well in Rick Warren’s forum, though McCain was clearly a crowd favorite as he was able to repeat conservative talking points to a mostly conservative crowd. He’s also no longer shy about discussing his time as a POW and he took many opportunities to bring that up. Obama also received plenty of applause, but he had to deal with questions on issues where he disagreed with evangelicals.

Warren had some interesting questions, but he never asked a follow-up question. If he asked a tough question, each candidate could say whatever they liked, because Warren didn’t want to play “gotcha.” In one sense that made it a civil conversation, but both candidates were able to say things without any fear of having the questioner challenge them, and that led to “stump speech” answers that weren’t very enlightening. McCain was able to ham it up with the conservative audience and basically tell them what they wanted to hear.

It will be interesting to see how this plays. Obama came across as thoughtful, but McCain really used it as a campaign event to beef up support with evangelicals. He probably scored points with conservatives, though independents might have been turned off by some of his answers. He drew a very hard line on abortion, which might hurt him with independent women.

Excellent article on the situation in Georgia

Michael Dobbs reviews the current situation in Georgia, explaining how there is plenty of blame to go around. The Georgian president made a terrible mistake, and Putin engineered a disproportionate response.

The Bush administration has been sending mixed messages to its Georgian friends. U.S. officials insist that they did not give the green light to Saakashvili for his attack on South Ossetia. At the same time, however, the United States has championed NATO membership for Georgia, sent military advisers to bolster the Georgian army and demanded the restoration of Georgian territorial integrity. American support might well have emboldened Saakashvili as he was considering how to respond to the “provocations” from South Ossetia.

Now the United States has ended up in a situation in the Caucasus where the Georgian tail was wagging the NATO dog. We were unable to control Saakashvili or to lend him effective assistance when his country was invaded. One lesson is that we need to be very careful in extending NATO membership, or even the promise of membership, to countries that we have neither the will nor the ability to defend.

In the meantime, American leaders have paid little attention to Russian diplomatic concerns, both inside the former borders of the Soviet Union and farther abroad. The Bush administration unilaterally abrogated the 1972 anti-missile defense treaty and ignored Putin when he objected to Kosovo independence on the grounds that it would set a dangerous precedent. It is difficult to explain why Kosovo should have the right to unilaterally declare its independence from Serbia, while the same right should be denied to places such as South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

The bottom line is that the United States is overextended militarily, diplomatically and economically. Even hawks such as Vice President Cheney, who have been vociferously denouncing Putin’s actions in Georgia, have no stomach for a military conflict with Moscow. The United States is bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan and needs Russian support in the coming trial of strength with Iran over its nuclear ambitions.

Instead of speaking softly and wielding a big stick, as Teddy Roosevelt recommended, the American policeman has been loudly lecturing the rest of the world while waving an increasingly unimpressive baton. The events of the past few days serve as a reminder that our ideological ambitions have greatly exceeded our military reach, particularly in areas such as the Caucasus, which is of only peripheral importance to the United States but of vital interest to Russia.

We are all Georgians?

It’s bizzarre that John McCain would repeat this line in an op-ed after the Georgian President basically scolded McCain in a CNN interview for his earlier remark. Basically, the President wanted deeds to go along with McCain’s words.

The Georgian president made an incredibly stupid mistake, and he apparantly did so with the belief that the United States would back him up if he took on Russia. The Russians have been ruthless, and the Georgian president had to resort to pleading his case repeatedly on CNN while Bush partied in Beijing and McCain made silly comments about our solidarity with the Georgians.

McCain’s credibility is further tainted by the fact that his foreign policy advisor was a paid lobbyist for the Georgian government. Could you imagine the hackles from the GOP if Barack Obama had someone advising him who had been paid to lobby for a foreign government? It’s simply galling that McCain, a self-proclaimed reformer, would put himself in a position where his judgement on an important national security issue is questioned because his advisor was once on the payroll of a foreign government. How does this fit into his disgusting “Country First” slogan? We’ve spent eight long years with an incompetent administration full of cronies who know how to use their influence to cash in. In this respect, McCain is a worthy heir to the Bush legacy.

We know McCain can be tough with Putin, but the question is whether he can be smart. His behavior during this campaign has demonstrated that he lacks judgement. He makes statements like “We are all Georgians” yet he is clearly unwilling to go to war with Russia over Georgia. It was a stupid comment. The Georgian president called him on it, and now he’s chosen to say it again. Unbelievable.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 NorthCoastBlog.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑