Notice: Undefined variable: galink_author_id in /home/premiumh/domains/northcoastblog.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/google-author-link/google-author-link.php on line 114

Category: Conservatives (Page 26 of 40)

McCain’s tough VP choice

The Joe Biden pick complicates things for John McCain as he considers his choice for a running mate. Bill Kristol points out some of the drawbacks of selecting Tim Pawlenty or Mitt Romney.

The two leading G.O.P. prospects have been Tim Pawlenty, the Minnesota governor, and Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor. But with Biden’s foreign policy experience as a contrast, could McCain assure voters that the young Pawlenty is ready to take over, if need be, as commander in chief? Also, Biden is a strong and experienced debater. Pawlenty is unproven. If he is the choice, there will be many anxious Republicans in the run-up to the vice presidential debate in St. Louis on Oct. 2.

Romney might match up better against Biden in debate. But it’s clear that the Obama-Biden campaign is moving aggressively to embrace a traditional Democratic populist economic message. Such a message will have appeal this year — especially, one supposes, against a doubly multimansioned G.O.P. ticket of McCain and Romney.

It’s hard to imagine Pawlenty going up against Biden. Also, Pawlenty made comments last month basically praising Barack Obama’s positive message and arguing that the GOP needs to move away from negative campaigning. Those words will present problems for McCain. Kristol also states the obvious – Romney’s wealth will reinforce the populaist message from the Democrats, and Romney’s history of being involved with companies that laid off thousands of workers won’t help.

Kristol goes on to argue for Joe Lieberman, the ultimate neocon. This would be a gift to the Obama camapign, as there would be a revolt among pro-life conservatives if Lieberman is added to the ticket. McCain has already trashed his image as a “moderate” as he’s embraced his far-right positions on abortion, judges and taxes. Adding Leiberman would confuse that message and undermine all the progress he’s made getting Republicans to come home and support his candidacy. Let’s hope he listens to Kristol.

McCain’s smears

For years, John McCain has enjoyed a great relationship with the press. Liberal commentators like Joe Klein and Jonathan Alter had great respect for McCain, and it was reflected in their commentary.

Both have turned on McCain, however, now that he has begun using all of the sleazy camapign tactics he once used to decry. McCain has sunk into the gutter, so Alter and other commentators are going after him.

Alter has an excellent article detailing the falsehoods in McCain’s ads.

For about a month, McCain’s campaign has been resorting to charges that are patently false. When Obama traveled abroad in July, to positive reviews, McCain decided he had to make attack ads that went far beyond the norm. In the past, plainly deceptive ads were the province of the Republican National Committee or the Democratic National Committee or independent committees free to fling mud that didn’t bear the fingerprints of candidates. But not this time. These smears come directly from the candidate.

First, a McCain ad charged that Obama was responsible for higher gas prices, which was not just false but absurd. Next, an ad said Obama had cancelled his trip to visit wounded soldiers in Germany because he couldn’t bring the press along. I was in Germany at the time, and as every reporter knew, the visit to the military hospital was never going to be open, not even to a press pool. It appeared on no press schedules. Obama had cancelled the visit when it was clear that the Pentagon viewed it as political. The charge was simply untrue.

The now famous Britney Spears and Paris Hilton ad, accusing Obama of being a celebrity, wasn’t false, just dopey. But it detracted attention from a string of false McCain spots on taxes. One ad said that Obama would raise taxes on electricity. Nope, not in Obama’s plan. Another said 23 million small-business owners would pay higher taxes under Obama. Factcheck.org found that the “vast majority” of small-business owners would pay the same in taxes as they do now, and “many” would pay less. An ad saying Obama had voted for a bill raising taxes, for families making more than $42,000 a year, was found to be “false.” And McCain’s consistent claim that Obama would “raise taxes on the middle class”–a major theme of his campaign–is “simply false,” according to this neutral policy center. In truth, under Obama’s plan, families earning less than $150,000 a year would get a tax cut, and only those making more than $250,000 would see their taxes rise. Maybe by the time the Democratic Congress got done with it, Obama’s tax program would look different. It’s reasonable to speculate that Democrats will raise taxes. But the McCain ads weren’t talking about that, they were talking about Obama’s plan, which is easily accessed on his Web site. McCain’s description of his opponent’s plan was and is untrue. This isn’t opinion, it’s fact.

The question is whether McCain will pay a price with independents for taking this approach. We’ll see. It helps if pundits like Alter keep letting him have it. We know that conservative commentators will not let up on Obama.

McCain says life begins at conception

John McCain’s simple statement at Saddlebrook might open up a can of worms for him in the general election on the issue of abortion. He clearly placated conservatives with his answer, but it also brings up a host of issues regarding brith control and abortion that he may not want to get into.

As I mentioned before, his clear statement will potentially turn off thousands of independent pro-choice women.

But, as Nancy Gibbs points out in Time, McCain will now have to answer very complicated questions about birth control and stem-cell research that are raised by his bright-line definition. As we’ve seen, McCain is terrible on domestic issues when he needs to get into the details. He often contradicts himself, and he’s not very good at nuance in these areas. The abortion mine field could be a huge problem for him in the fall.

Of course, Obama will face his own issues on abortion, which may hurt him with Catholics and Reagan Democrats. He can only hope that McCain creates his own problems with this issue as well.

Alan Colmes takes on John McCain’s admitted infidelity

Wow. Alan Colmes is getting tough!

Here’s a clip of Alan Colmes taking on Sean Hannity and some conservative pundits who were ripping John Edwards for his admitted affair. After we get a typical tirade from Hannity about how we can’t trust someone who hasn’t been true to his wife and family, Colmes seizes on the opening and raises the issue of John McCain’s admissions that he was not faithful to his first wife.

Hannity goes crazy, arguing that this was thirty years ago and that McCain was a prisoner of war. Of course, he has a point. I don’t think we should disqualify a candidate for issues like this, particularly when it happened years ago. But, Hannity and other moralists are more than happy to scream for bright-line moral tests when they apply to Democrats, but they won’t apply the same standards to their side.

Colmes let’s him have it, and he doesn’t back down. He’s taken plenty of flack over the years for being the liberal stooge on Fox, but this clip shows that he does have his moments.

Hat tip: Fark

Fortress America – Be careful bringing a laptop across the border

This is getting to be ridiculous.

Federal agents may take a traveler’s laptop or other electronic device to an off-site location for an unspecified period of time without any suspicion of wrongdoing, as part of border search policies the Department of Homeland Security recently disclosed.

Also, officials may share copies of the laptop’s contents with other agencies and private entities for language translation, data decryption or other reasons, according to the policies, dated July 16 and issued by two DHS agencies, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“The policies . . . are truly alarming,” said Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), who is probing the government’s border search practices. He said he intends to introduce legislation soon that would require reasonable suspicion for border searches, as well as prohibit profiling on race, religion or national origin.

DHS officials said that the newly disclosed policies — which apply to anyone entering the country, including U.S. citizens — are reasonable and necessary to prevent terrorism. Officials said such procedures have long been in place but were disclosed last month because of public interest in the matter.

There’s no reason to have such a broad policy when it comes to U.S. citizens. It’s also unconstitutional. The “probable cause” test seems very appropriate for citizens, and a lower threshhold of reasonable concern would be appropriate for non-citizens.

This is an example where we need “activist” judges. The whole point of our constitution was the separation of powers. The sad fact is that our government, and all governments, sometimes get overzealous. They want to “protect” us, and in doing so they destroy our freedoms. That’s why we need a bunch of unelected judges to reign in our elected officials. Elected officials are too often swayed the the fears of the moment and the mood swings of the electorate.

Conservatives don’t get this. They love to demonize judges, until they need them to protect us from a government that goes too far.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 NorthCoastBlog.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑